Is this style suitable for IEEE Aerospace?

Yes. The "rounded boxes + thin arrows + monochrome accent" style matches the IEEE Aerospace figure conventions; you may want to convert to grayscale before submission.

PromptsSystems

SystemsText → ImageMid creditEN

3U CubeSat System Architecture

Block diagram of CubeSat subsystems with simulation environment integration.

When to use this prompt

For aerospace / IEEE engineering papers and student capstone reports.

The prompt

A 3U CubeSat system architecture block diagram.

Center: a large rounded rectangle titled "3U CubeSat System".

Branching out clockwise, five subsystem blocks:
1) Electrical Power System (EPS) — solar panels, battery pack, power-distribution unit.
2) Attitude Determination and Control (ADCS) — IMU, sun sensor, magnetorquers, reaction wheels.
3) Command and Data Handling (C&DH) — flight computer, watchdog, mass storage.
4) Communications (COM) — UHF/VHF radio, S-band downlink, antennas.
5) Payload — primary mission instrument (imaging camera + onboard preprocessor).

Each subsystem block lists its 2–3 core components in a small bullet list inside.

Outside the central system, on the right: "NASA 42 Dynamic Simulator" cylinder labeled as the simulation environment, connected to the C&DH block via a bidirectional arrow labeled "telemetry / commands".

Style: clean engineering schematic, deep blue / teal / gray palette, rounded boxes, thin black arrows with arrowhead labels, white background, IEEE Aerospace figure style.

Variations

Mission-mode state diagram

Replace the architecture with a state diagram showing the CubeSat mission modes: Launch -> Detumble -> Sun-pointing -> Imaging -> Downlink -> Safe. Show transitions with labeled arrows.

Tips

List subsystems in the order they would be powered on — readers parse top-down by default.
Mention specific component examples ("magnetorquer", "S-band radio") — they unlock standard icons.
External tools / environments belong outside the central block, never inside.